Clinical Evaluation of Medical Devices according to MDR

MEDDEV 2.7/1 - MDR Class I, IIa, IIb, and III

Clinical evaluation is a key regulatory element for the CE marking of medical devices in Europe. It demonstrates that a medical device is clinically safe, effective, and has a positive risk-benefit ratio throughout its entire product life cycle.

Manufacturers are required to conduct a clinical evaluation for each medical device in accordance with the Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (MDR). The requirements apply to all risk classes, with increasing depth and complexity for products in classes IIa, IIb, and III as well as for implantable devices.

WQS has been supporting manufacturers for over 30 years in the planning, implementation, and updating of clinical evaluations in a practical, regulatory-compliant, and audit-proof manner.

Clinical Evaluation process under MDR: quality seals and rating symbols represent the demonstration of safety, clinical performance, and a positive benefit–risk profile of medical devices in accordance with MEDDEV 2.7/1.

What is a clinical evaluation?

A clinical evaluation is a systematic and continuous collection, analysis, and assessment of clinical data to demonstrate the safety and clinical performance of a medical device.

The aim is to demonstrate that the medical device achieves the intended clinical performance, is suitable for its intended purpose, has an acceptable benefit-risk profile, and corresponds to the generally recognized state of the art.

For implantable medical devices and Class III products, a clinical trial is often required unless existing clinical data sufficiently demonstrate safety and performance.

What clinical data is used for a clinical evaluation?

According to the MDR, clinical data is based in particular on:

  • the critical evaluation of scientific literature,
  • the critical evaluation of available clinical investigations,
  • where applicable, own clinical investigations,
  • and clinical data from market surveillance (PMS/PMCF).

What legal requirements apply to clinical evaluation under the MDR? Legal framework and guidelines

Article 10 of the MDR requires manufacturers to perform a clinical evaluation for all classes of medical devices (Class I, IIa, IIb, and III).

The regulatory requirements for clinical evaluation are specified in particular in:

  • Article 10 MDR – Responsibility of the manufacturer
  • Article 61 MDR – Clinical evaluation
  • Annex XIV MDR – Clinical evaluation and PMCF

In addition, recognized guidelines and interpretation aids apply, in particular:

  • MEDDEV 2.7/1 Rev. 4 (still relevant guidance)
  • MDCG 2020-1 – Clinical evaluation of medical software
  • MDCG 2020-5 – Equivalence
  • MDCG 2020-6 – Clinical evidence for existing products
  • MDCG 2020-7 / 2020-8 – PMCF plan and PMCF report
  • MDCG 2023-7 – Exceptions to clinical investigation
  • MDCG 2024-10 – Orphan devices
  • In addition, other product-specific guidelines must be taken into account if they are relevant to the medical device in question.

These documents describe the structure, methodology, and content of an MDR-compliant clinical evaluation and serve to demonstrate the general safety and performance requirements in accordance with MDR Annex I, in particular Sections 1 and 8. Article 61 and Annex XIV also specify post-market clinical follow-up (PMCF) as part of post-market surveillance (PMS).

Clinical Evaluation Plan and Report

For which medical devices and risk classes is a clinical evaluation mandatory?

A clinical evaluation is mandatory for every medical device, regardless of its risk class (Class I, IIa, IIb, and III). It must be planned, documented, and updated throughout the entire product life cycle.

When is a clinical investigation particularly necessary?

The need for an additional clinical investigation depends on the required level of evidence and possible gaps in the available clinical data.

A clinical investigation is required if the available clinical data is insufficient to demonstrate the clinical safety and performance of the medical device for its intended purpose. For implantable medical devices and Class III products, the MDR generally requires a clinical investigation, unless regulated exceptions apply, such as for certain legacy devices with sufficient clinical evidence.

Exceptions are only possible in very limited cases, such as proven equivalence or established technologies, always with valid scientific justification.

How does the clinical evaluation process work according to the MDR?

The clinical evaluation is documented in two key documents: the Clinical Evaluation Plan (CEP) and the Clinical Evaluation Report (CER).

1. Clinical Evaluation Plan (CEP)

The CEP forms the strategic basis of the clinical evaluation. It defines in advance how clinical evidence will be provided and includes, among other things:

  • Determination of the general safety and performance requirements
  • Intended purpose and medical indication
  • Target group, users, contraindications
  • Desired clinical benefit
  • Relevant clinical endpoints
  • Evaluation methodology and literature review
  • Clinical development plan
  • Criteria for benefit-risk assessment

2. Clinical Evaluation Report (CER)

The CER documents and evaluates all available clinical data and includes:

  • Evaluation of all relevant clinical data
  • Analysis of positive and negative effects
  • Assessment of clinical performance and safety
  • Conclusions on the benefit-risk ratio
  • Justification of conformity with MDR Annex I
  • The CER is a mandatory requirement for CE marking and is updated regularly.


The CER is a necessary requirement for CE marking and must be regularly updated, particularly in the context of Post-Market Surveillance and Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up.

How can equivalence be demonstrated in the clinical evaluation?

Manufacturers can use clinical data from comparable products if proven similarity exists:

  • clinically (indication, population, performance)
  • technically (design, properties, conditions of use)
  • biologically (materials, contact with the body)


The MDR places high demands on scientific justification and access to comparative data. The MDCG 2020-5 guideline specifies these requirements.

Why is PMCF a mandatory part of clinical evaluation?

Clinical evaluation is a continuous process. After placing the device on the market, the manufacturer must continue to monitor its clinical performance.

The Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up serves to:

  • confirm safety and performance on the market,
  • identify new risks or side effects,
  • continuously evaluate the benefit-risk ratio,
  • identify misuse.

The PMCF plan and PMCF report are an integral part of the technical documentation.

How does WQS support manufacturers with clinical evaluation?

WQS has been supporting medical device manufacturers for over 30 years with:

  • Creation of CEP and CER
  • Equivalence assessments
  • Planning and evaluating clinical trials
  • PMCF strategies and updates
  • Preparing for audits and notified bodies


We draw on an interdisciplinary network of clinical and regulatory experts to clinically test your Class I, IIa, IIb, and III medical devices.

Need more information?

WQS provides you with detailed information on your subject.
You can also explore our FAQ page and other resources for further insight
 or simply contact us for direct support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes. According to the Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745, a clinical evaluation is required for every medical device, regardless of its risk class (Class I, IIa, IIb, or III). It must be planned, documented, and regularly updated throughout the entire product life cycle.

Clinical evaluations must be performed by professionally qualified individuals. These individuals must have in-depth knowledge of medical technology, clinical applications, scientific methodology and the MDR. For higher-class or implantable medical devices, additional clinical expertise in the respective field of application is required. Manufacturers often work with specialised external consultants for this purpose. Contact WQSfor a tailored, non-binding quote.

The clinical evaluation must be updated continuously throughout the product’s life cycle. Even after the product has been placed on the market, the manufacturer must regularly monitor and update its clinical performance.

A clinical evaluation without a separate clinical investigation is possible if sufficient clinical data is available to demonstrate safety and performance for the intended purpose. This may be the case, for example, with established technologies, existing products, or the permissible use of equivalence data, provided that the MDR requirements are fully met.

Clinical evaluation is regulated in particular in Article 10 MDR (Obligations of the manufacturer), Article 61 MDR (Clinical evaluation), and Annex XIV MDR. In addition, guidelines such as MEDDEV 2.7/1 Rev. 4 and various MDCG documents apply to the interpretation of the requirements.

The clinical evaluation requires, among other things, information on the intended purpose, technical documentation, risk management results, clinical data from literature and studies, and market surveillance data. The exact scope is determined by the Clinical Evaluation Plan and the individual product profile.